Low-precision training is critical for optimizing the trade-off between model quality and training costs, necessitating the joint allocation of model size, dataset size, and numerical precision. While empirical scaling laws suggest that quantization impacts effective model and data capacities or acts as an additive error, the theoretical mechanisms governing these effects remain largely unexplored. In this work, we initiate a theoretical study of scaling laws for low-precision training within a high-dimensional sketched linear regression framework. By analyzing multiplicative (signal-dependent) and additive (signal-independent) quantization, we identify a critical dichotomy in their scaling behaviors. Our analysis reveals that while both schemes introduce an additive error and degrade the effective data size, they exhibit distinct effects on effective model size: multiplicative quantization maintains the full-precision model size, whereas additive quantization reduces the effective model size. Numerical experiments validate our theoretical findings. By rigorously characterizing the complex interplay among model scale, dataset size, and quantization error, our work provides a principled theoretical basis for optimizing training protocols under practical hardware constraints.

The central objective of empirical asset pricing is to identify firm-level signals that explain the cross-section of expected stock returns--whether through exposure to risk factors or persistent mispricing. The dominant paradigm, grounded in the assumption of self-predictability, asserts that a firm's own characteristics forecast its own returns (see, e.g., Cochrane (2011); Harvey et al. (2016)). Complementing this view is a growing literature on cross-predictability--the idea that the characteristics or returns of one asset can help forecast the returns of others (see, e.g., Lo and MacKinlay (1990); Hou (2007); Cohen and Frazzini (2008); Cohen and Lou (2012); Huang et al. (2021, 2022)). A key mechanism underpinning this phenomenon is the presence of lead-lag effects, whereby price movements or information from one firm precede and predict those of related firms. Such effects can stem from staggered information diffusion, peer influence within industries, supply chain linkages, or correlated trading by institutional investors that induces price pressure across related assets. Despite recent methodological advances in modeling cross-stock predictability, several foundational questions remain unresolved. Chief among them is how a mean-variance investor can analytically integrate multiple predictive signals when returns are interconnected across assets. Equally crucial is developing a framework that jointly captures both the relevance of individual signals and the structure of return spillovers--enhancing portfolio performance while preserving interpretability .

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Markov decision processes (MDPs) often suffer from the sensitivity issue under model ambiguity. In recent years, robust MDPs have emerged as an effective framework to overcome this challenge. Distributionally robust MDPs extend the robust MDP framework by incorporating distributional information of the uncertain model parameters to alleviate the conservative nature of robust MDPs.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Ta s k: Your task is to boil tin.

This protocol is often regarded as a "golden compass" for navigating SoT A detectors. But can these stand-out "winners" be